Domain Indicators
Each domain provides specific indicators designed to measure performance against district expectations and professional integrity.
Leadership & District Alignment
- Mission and strategic alignment
- Problem-solving under pressure
- Planning and follow-through
- Professional integrity and collaboration
- Trust and districtwide improvement
Communication & Collaboration
- Clear, accurate, and timely communication
- Listening and perspectives
- Cross-site collaboration
- Proactive follow-up
- Respectful difficult conversations
People Leadership & Capacity
- Inclusive culture and fairness
- Direction and delegation
- Coaching and capacity building
- Timely feedback and evaluations
- Personnel response grounded in agreements
Operations & Expertise
- Technical proficiency
- Efficient operations and budgeting
- Safe and responsive systems
- Compliance with law and policy
- Data and continuous improvement
Culture & Organizational Impact
- Service to students and staff
- Belonging and trust
- Cross-boundary problem solving
- Ethical stewardship
- Reflection and growth
Rating Guidance
Clear, evidence-informed ratings that align with district expectations and support professional growth.
Rating Framework
Our evaluation process uses a clear five-tier rating system: Meets Expectations, Area for Growth, Unsatisfactory, and Not Applicable. This framework ensures consistency and transparency across all classified management roles within the district.
Meets Expectations
Consistently demonstrates the core competencies and leadership standards required for the role. Evidence is robust and directly supports the rating.
Unsatisfactory
Significant gaps in performance that require immediate attention. Evidence must clearly demonstrate a lack of proficiency in key operational or leadership areas.
Area for Growth
Shows potential for improvement in specific leadership domains. Evidence highlights strengths but also identifies clear areas for targeted professional development.
Not Applicable
Used when the role or assignment does not require the specific leadership competencies being evaluated. This rating is documented with supporting evidence.